• Critical care medicine · Feb 1998

    Comparative Study

    Diagnostic accuracy of protected specimen brush and bronchoalveolar lavage in nosocomial pneumonia: impact of previous antimicrobial treatments.

    • B Souweine, B Veber, J P Bedos, B Gachot, M C Dombret, B Regnier, and M Wolff.
    • Service de Réanimation des Maladies Infectieuses, Groupe Hospitalier Bichat-Claude Bernard, Paris, France.
    • Crit. Care Med. 1998 Feb 1;26(2):236-44.

    ObjectiveTo determine whether the diagnostic accuracy of bronchoscopy samples in patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia is affected by prior antibiotic treatment given for a previous infection, and/or by antibiotic treatment recently started to treat suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia.DesignStudy of critically ill patients.SettingIntensive care unit in a university hospital.PatientsSixty-three episodes of suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia were prospectively evaluated. Based on prior antibiotic treatment, three groups were defined: no antibiotic group (no previous antibiotic treatments), n = 12; current antibiotic group (antibiotic treatment initiated >72 hrs earlier), n = 31; and recent antibiotic group (new antibiotic treatment class started within the last 24 hrs), n = 20.InterventionsFiberoptic bronchoscopy with quantitative protected specimen brush cultures, bronchoalveolar lavage cultures, and intracellular organism counts of bronchoalveolar lavage cells.Measurements And Main ResultsThe diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia was made in 35 cases, based on histology (n = 2), cavitation (n = 2), blood cultures (n = 4), or outcome under appropriate antibiotic treatment (n = 27). The discriminative value of the tests, based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, was high (> or =0.85) in both current antibiotic treatment and recent antibiotic treatment patients. Sensitivities for a 5% intracellular organism count of bronchoalveolar lavage cells, a protected specimen brush culture threshold of 10(3) colony-forming units (cfu)/mL, and a bronchoalveolar lavage culture threshold of 10(5) cfu/mL were as follows, respectively, in the three groups: 0.71, 0.88, and 0.71 (no antibiotic treatment group); 0.5, 0.77, and 0.83 (current antibiotic group); and 0.67, 0.40, and 0.38 (recent antibiotic group). Specificity was consistently > or =0.9. In the recent antibiotic group, protected specimen brush and bronchoalveolar lavage cultures had lower sensitivities (p < .05), and the best threshold values for these two tests were 10(2) cfu/mL and 10(3) cfu/mL, respectively.ConclusionsAfter recent introduction of an antibiotic treatment for suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia, protected specimen brush and bronchoalveolar lavage culture thresholds must be decreased to maintain good accuracy. In contrast, current antibiotic treatment prescribed for a prior infectious disease does not modify the diagnostic accuracy of protected specimen brush or bronchoalveolar lavage.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…