-
Critical care medicine · May 2009
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative StudyHigh-frequency percussive ventilation improves perioperatively clinical evolution in pulmonary resection.
- Umberto Lucangelo, Vittorio Antonaglia, Walter A Zin, Marco Confalonieri, Massimo Borelli, Mario Columban, Silvio Cassio, Irene Batticci, Massimo Ferluga, Maurizio Cortale, and Giorgio Berlot.
- Departments of Perioperative Medicine, Intensive Care and Emergency, Cattinara Hospital, University School of Medicine, Trieste, Italy. u.lucangelo@fmc.units.it
- Crit. Care Med. 2009 May 1;37(5):1663-9.
ObjectiveDuring thoracotomy, positive end-expiratory pressure is applied to the dependent lung and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) inflates the nondependent lung to avoid hypoxemia. These methods do not allow the removal of produced secretions. We hypothesized that high-frequency percussive ventilation(HFPV) can improve both conditions and reduce hospital length of stay in these patients.DesignRandomized prospective study.SettingUniversity Hospital.PatientsFifty-three consecutive patients undergoing elective pulmonary partial resection were enrolled. Nine were excluded because of surgical reasons.InterventionsThe nondependent lung was ventilated with HFPV in 22 patients and other 22 received CPAP. In both groups,the dependent lung was ventilated with continuous mechanical ventilation.Measurement And Main ResultsCardiocirculatory variables and blood gas analysis were measured during surgery. Postoperatively,all patients underwent chest physiotherapy, and SpO2,body temperature, the amount of sputum produced, and chest radiography were recorded. Before nondependent lung re-expansion,HFPV patients presented higher PaO2 than CPAP group (p = 0.020). The amount of secretions was higher in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients treated with HFPV than in those who received CPAP (199 and 64 mL, respectively, p = 0.028). HFPV increased by 5.28 times the chance of sputum production by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients (chi(2) = 46.66, p < 0.0001; odds ratio = 5.28). A patient treated with HFPV had a 3.14-fold larger chance of being discharged earlier than a CPAP-treated subject (likelihood ratio = 11.5, p = 0.0007).ConclusionsUnder the present settings, HFPV improved oxygenation in one-lung ventilation during pulmonary resection. Postoperatively, it decreased the length of stay and increased the removal of secretions in comparison with CPAP.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.