-
- Ashish Suri, Ravinder Pal Singh Chabbra, Veer Singh Mehta, Sailesh Gaikwad, and Ram Mohan Pandey.
- Departments of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, 110029, New Delhi, India. surineuro@yahoo.co.in
- Spine J. 2003 Jan 1;3(1):33-45.
Background ContextIntramedullary signal intensity changes on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in cervical spondylotic myelopathy are thought to be indicative of the prognosis. However, the prognostic significance of signal intensity changes remains controversial.PurposeTo determine the radiographic and clinical factors that correlate with the prognosis after surgery in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and to investigate the factors affecting the outcome of intramedullary signal changes on MRI.Study DesignA prospective study evaluating clinical parameters and MRI in consecutive patients operated on for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.Patient SampleA total of 146 consecutive patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy operated on during a 2-year period (September 1999 to September 2001) formed the study group.Outcome MeasuresAge, duration of symptoms, number of cervical prolapsed intervertebral discs, surgical approach, preoperative signal changes, residual compression and postoperative outcome of signal changes; clinical outcome (motor, sensory, autonomic and disability improvement).MethodsThe participants in this study underwent anterior cervical discectomy/corpectomy or laminectomy/laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Clinical features and MRI findings were studied in detail and compared with postoperative clinical and radiological status. The spinal cord signal intensity changes were evaluated before and after surgery. The multifactorial effect of such variables as age, duration of symptoms, number of prolapsed intervertebral discs, surgical approach (anterior/posterior), preoperative cord changes on T1- and T2-weighted sequences and persistence/regression of cord changes on clinical outcome (motor/sensory/autonomic/disability improvement) was studied using stepwise logistic regression. The highlight of the study is the analysis of the factors affecting regression of cord changes and their effect on postoperative outcome.ResultsPreoperative intramedullary signal changes were present in 121 of 146 patients (82.9%); of these 121 patients, T1- and T2-weighted images were present in 81, and T2-weighted images were present in 40 (no patient had isolated T1 change). Postoperative MRI could be obtained in 44 of 121 patients (36.4%) with preoperative intramedullary signal changes; 14 had regression of cord changes. There was no significant difference in the clinical presentation of patients with and without cord changes. There was a significant correlation between the surgical outcome of patients and their age, duration of symptoms, number of cervical prolapsed intervertebral discs, surgical approach, preoperative signal changes, residual compression and postoperative outcome of signal changes. The patients with no intramedullary signal changes and signal changes only on T2-weighted images had a better outcome than patients with signal changes on both T1- and T2-weighted images. The patients with regression of intramedullary signal changes had significantly better outcome. There was no significant correlation between regression of signal changes and other factors. However, chronicity of disease, multiplicity of discs and postoperative residual compression relatively affect persistence of intramedullary signal changes.ConclusionsThe presence of intramedullary signal changes on T1- as well as T2-weighted sequences on MRI in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy indicates a poor prognosis. However, the T2 signal intensity changes reflect a broad spectrum of spinal cord reparative potentials. Predictors of surgical outcomes are preoperative signal intensity change patterns of the spinal cord and their postoperative persistence/regression on radiological evaluations, age at the time of surgery, multiplicity of involvement and chronicity of the disease and surgical approach (anterior/posterior).
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.