• Chun-Yi Lee, Yao-Kuang Wu, Chou-Chin Lan, Kuei-Yao Hsu, Kun-Mao Chao, and Hung Chang.
• Graduate Institute of Biomedical Electronics and Bioinformatics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
• Shock. 2011 Dec 1;36(6):628-32.

AbstractPulse pressure variation (PPV) is a promising predictor for volume responsiveness. However, recent studies have criticized its validity during small tidal volume (TV) ventilation. The present study evaluated the influence of pressure control level (PCL) on PPV. Six anesthetized healthy piglets simulating hemorrhagic shock underwent five stages of intravascular volume status change. Each stage comprised four cycles of PCL manipulation. In each cycle, five different PCLs were applied in random order. Among 600 arterial pressure tracings obtained during PCL manipulations, 26 tracings were excluded because of signal artifact or ectopic beats. For the remaining 574 tracings, the percentage of normal beats among total recorded beats in each tracing was 99.80% ± 0.85%. When manipulating PCL causing an abrupt change within -16 ∼ +8 cmH(2)O, the PPV responded rapidly and stabilized within 60 s after manipulation. With higher increment in PCL (+12 ∼ +16 cmH(2)O), it required 90 s for PPV to stabilize. Under each cycle of PCL manipulation, the PPVs are linearly correlated to the PCL (r = 0.84 ± 0.21) and TV (r = 0.83 ± 0.22). The PPV as well as the slopes of the trend lines decreased from hypovolemic stages toward hypervolemic stages. Pulse pressure variation responds rapidly to change in ventilator setting and is linearly correlated with the PCL and TV. These characteristics may have important applications in critical care to improve the interpretation of PPV in accord to different ventilator settings.

10 keywords...

hide…