• T Suzuki, K Munakata, N Watanabe, N Katsumata, S Saeki, and S Ogawa.
• Department of Anaesthesiology, Surugadai Nihon University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
• Br J Anaesth. 1999 Sep 1;83(3):485-7.

AbstractWe have quantified the potentiating effects of 1.7% sevoflurane (n = 12) on vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block and compared the results with those obtained during balanced anaesthesia with propofol (n = 12) or midazolam (n = 12) in 36 patients. Neuromuscular function was monitored using an accelerograph and the train-of-four responses of the adductor pollicis muscle to ulnar nerve stimulation. Vecuronium 0.1 mg kg-1 was administered as an intubating dose, and maintenance doses of 0.02 mg kg-1 were administered on three occasions when T1/T0 had recovered to 25%. Thereafter, spontaneous recovery was monitored until complete. Times to 25% recovery of T1/T0 (DUR25) after an intubating dose of vecuronium did not differ between groups (mean 44.2 (SD 18.7) min for sevoflurane, 38.3 (7.5) min for propofol and 35.5 (9.5) min for midazolam). DUR25 values after each maintenance dose were 29.8 (9.5) min, 30.3 (10.4) min and 31.6 (10.7) min during sevoflurane anaesthesia, and were significantly longer than values for propofol (21.7 (6.0) min, 21.5 (5.8) min and 21.9 (5.8) min) and midazolam (20.0 (5.9) min, 19.3 (7.7) min and 19.8 (8.0) min) (P < 0.05) in each case). Recovery index25-75% and interval from T1/T0 = 25% to T4/T1 = 0.7 after the final dose of vecuronium were significantly prolonged by sevoflurane (28.3 (13.2) min and 42.7 (16.4) min) compared with propofol (17.6 (6.1) min and 26.6 (9.8) min) or midazolam (16.3 (9.4) min and 26.0 (10.2) min) (P < 0.05 in each case).

26 keywords...

hide…