• Anna Likhacheva, Chelsea C Pinnix, Neil R Parikh, Pamela K Allen, Mary F McAleer, Max S Chiu, Erik P Sulman, Anita Mahajan, Nandita Guha-Thakurta, Sujit S Prabhu, Daniel P Cahill, Dershan Luo, Almon S Shiu, Paul D Brown, and Eric L Chang.
• Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
• Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2013 Mar 1;85(3):656-61.

PurposeThe number of brain metastases (BM) is a major consideration in determining patient eligibility for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), but the evidence for this popular practice is equivocal. The purpose of this study was to determine whether, following multivariate adjustment, the number and volume of BM held prognostic significance in a cohort of patients initially treated with SRS alone.Methods And MaterialsA total of 251 patients with primary malignancies, including non-small cell lung cancer (34%), melanoma (30%), and breast carcinoma (16%), underwent SRS for initial treatment of BM. SRS was used as the sole management (62% of patients) or was combined with salvage treatment with SRS (22%), whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT; 13%), or resection (3%). Median follow-up time was 9.4 months. Survival was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression was used to assess the effects of patient factors on distant brain failure (DBF), local control (LC), and overall survival (OS).ResultsLC at 1 year was 94.6%, and median time to DBF was 10 months. Median OS was 11.1 months. On multivariate analysis, statistically significant predictors of OS were presence of extracranial disease (hazard ratio [HR], 4.2, P<.001), total tumor volume greater than 2 cm(3) (HR, 1.98; P<.001), age ≥60 years (HR, 1.67; P=.002), and diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (HR, 0.71; P<.001). The presence of extracranial disease was a statistically significant predictor of DBF (HR, 2.15), and tumor volume was predictive of LC (HR, 4.56 for total volume >2 cm(3)). The number of BM was not predictive of DBF, LC, or OS.ConclusionsThe number of BM is not a strong predictor for clinical outcomes following initial SRS for newly diagnosed BM. Other factors including total treatment volume and systemic disease status are better determinants of outcome and may facilitate appropriate use of SRS or WBRT.Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

37 keywords...

hide…