• Arch Phys Med Rehabil · Nov 2014

    Multicenter Study

    Determining the most robust dimensional structure of categories from the international classification of functioning, disability and health across subgroups of persons with spinal cord injury to build the basis for future clinical measures.

    • Carolina S Ballert, Gerold Stucki, Fin Biering-Sørensen, and Alarcos Cieza.
    • Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland; Department of Health Sciences and Health Policy, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland; ICF Research Branch in cooperation with the WHO Collaborating Centre for the Family of International Classifications in Germany (at DIMDI), Nottwil, Switzerland.
    • Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Nov 1;95(11):2111-2119.e12.

    ObjectiveTo determine the most robust dimensional structure of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) categories relevant to spinal cord injury (SCI) across subgroups of lesion level, health care context, sex, age, and resources of the country.DesignA multidimensional between-item response Rasch model was used. The choice of the dimensions was conceptually driven using the ICF components from the functioning chapters and splits of the activity and participation component described in the ICF.SettingSecondary analysis of data from an international, cross-sectional, multicentric study for the Development of ICF Core Sets for Spinal Cord Injury.ParticipantsPersons with SCI (N=1048) from the early postacute and long-term living context from 14 middle/low- and high-resource countries.InterventionsNot applicable.Main Outcome MeasureRatings of categories of the ICF relevant for SCI were analyzed.ResultsFive models were tested on the complete sample and 5 subgroups. The overall reliability of all models and reliability within dimensions of the unidimensional and 2-dimensional models were good to excellent. The ICF categories spread well along the disability scale. The model fit improvement from the unidimensional to the 2-dimensional and from the 2-dimensional to the 3-dimensional model was significant in all groups (P<.0001). The improvement, however, from a unidimensional to a 2-dimensional structure was markedly better than from a 2-dimensional to a 3-dimensional one.ConclusionsWe propose that a 2-dimensional structure separating body functions and body structures from the activity and participation categories should serve as a basis for developing clinical measures in SCI in the future.Copyright © 2014 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.