• Pediatr Crit Care Me · Sep 2012

    Long-stay children in intensive care: long-term functional outcome and quality of life from a 20-yr institutional study.

    • Anna Taylor, Warwick Butt, Poongundran Namachivayam, Terence Montague, Karen Moran, Joanne Barrie, and Carmel Delzoppo.
    • Intensive Care Unit, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. namachivayam@rch.org.au
    • Pediatr Crit Care Me. 2012 Sep 1;13(5):520-8.

    ObjectiveLong-stay patients (≥28 days) in pediatric intensive care units consume a disproportionate amount of resources, and very few studies have reported their outcome. We determined the long-term outcome of these children admitted to intensive care over a 20-yr period (January 1, 1989 to December 31, 2008).SettingPediatric intensive care unit in a university-affiliated tertiary pediatric hospital in Melbourne, AustraliaMethodsDemographic and clinical characteristics were compared after dividing patients into four groups depending on year of admission (1989-1993, 1994-1998, 1999-2003, and 2004-2008). Preadmission health status and long-term functional outcome were evaluated by a modified Glasgow outcome scale. Quality of life was assessed by using the Health Utilities Index Mark 1.ResultsOver the 20-yr period, 233 long-stay patients had 269 long stay admission episodes to the pediatric intensive care unit, accounting for 1% (269 of 27,536) of all pediatric intensive care unit admissions and utilized 18.5% (15,740 of 85,032) of occupied bed days. Bed occupancy of long stay patients (as percentage of overall pediatric intensive care unit bed occupancy) increased from 8% in 1989 to 21% in 2008 (p = .001). Median age at admission was 4.2 months [interquartile range 0.38-41.5] and median length of stay was 40 days [interquartile range 32-57]. One hundred sixteen of 233 (49.8%) patients had died at the time of follow-up. Children who died were younger compared to survivors (median 3.4 months [interquartile range 0.38-41.5 vs. median 7.6 months, interquartile range 0.6-71.1, p = .026], had a higher proportion of comorbid illness (91% vs. 80%, p = .026), and 63% had a preexisting moderate or severe disability compared to 51% of survivors (p = .215). One hundred seventeen of 233 children survived and long-term functional outcome was favorable (normal, functionally normal, or mild disability) in 27% (63 of 233) and unfavorable (moderate or severe disability) for 17.2% (40 of 233). Outcome status was not known for 6% (14 of 233). Among survivors (n = 117), more than 50% (63 of 117) had favorable outcome. The quality of life in patients aged >2 yrs at follow up was good in 21% (40 of 222), moderate in 8% (16 of 222), poor quality in 68% (130 of 222, this includes deaths), and very poor in 3% (5 of 222).ConclusionsMore than two-thirds of children who stay in intensive care for ≥28 days have an unfavorable outcome (moderate disability, severe disability, or death). Long-stay patients in pediatric intensive care utilized a large proportion of resources and this utilization has considerably increased with time. Service provision and policy making should expect worsening of these trends in the future; its effects on critical care bed availability and overall activity levels could be substantial.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…