• Mathias Zuercher, Ronald W Hilwig, Mike Gura, Jon Nysaether, Vinay M Nadkarni, Marc D Berg, Karl B Kern, and Robert A Berg.
• The University of Arizona Sarver Heart Center, Tucson, AZ, USA.
• Resuscitation. 2011 Sep 1;82(9):1231-4.

AimTo determine whether the residual weight of a 260 g sternal accelerometer/force feedback device (AFFD) adversely affects hemodynamics during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a piglet model of ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest.MethodsAfter induction of ventricular fibrillation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation was provided to ten piglets (10.8 ± 1.9 kg) for 12 min while maintaining aortic systolic pressure of 80-90 mm Hg during four 3-min periods with or without an AFFD on the chest. Cardiac output and left ventricular myocardial blood flow were determined by neutron-microsphere technique.ResultsUsing a linear mixed-effect model with residual maximum likelihood estimation to control for changes in cardiopulmonary resuscitation hemodynamics over time, cardiac output and myocardial blood flow did not differ with AFFD versus without AFFD. During the first 6 min, mean (± SEM) cardiac outputs were 0.42 (± 0.05)L/min with AFFD versus 0.31 (± 0.04)L/min without AFFD, and median left ventricular myocardial blood flows were 40.5 (± 7.3)mL/min/100g with AFFD versus 40.4 (± 5.0)mL/min/100g without AFFD. The mean right atrial diastolic pressures and coronary perfusion pressures were also not different (8 ± 0.7 mm Hg versus 8 ± 0.9 mm Hg and 16 ± 2 mm Hg versus 16 ± 2 mm Hg, respectively, during the first 6 min of CPR).ConclusionThe use of a 260 g accelerometer/force feedback device designed for real-time feedback to the rescuer during resuscitation efforts did not adversely affect cardiac output or left ventricular myocardial blood flow during 12 min of chest compressions in a piglet model of ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest.Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

30 keywords...

hide…