• A Palanisamy, A A Mitani, and L C Tsen.
• Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
• Int J Obstet Anesth. 2011 Jan 1;20(1):10-6.

BackgroundComplications from general anesthesia for cesarean delivery are a leading cause of anesthesia-related mortality. As a consequence, the overall use of general anesthesia in this setting is becoming less common. The impact and implications of this trend are considered in relation to a similar study performed at our institution 10 years ago.MethodsThe hospital database for all cesarean deliveries performed during six calendar years (January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2005) was reviewed. The medical records of all parturients who received general anesthesia were examined to collect personal details and data pertinent to the indications for cesarean delivery and general anesthesia, mode of airway management and associated anesthetic complications.ResultsCesarean deliveries accounted for 23.65% to 31.51% of an annual total ranging from 8543 to 10091 deliveries. The percentage of cases performed under general anesthesia ranged from 0.5% to 1%. A perceived lack of time for neuraxial anesthesia accounted for more than half of the general anesthesia cases each year, with maternal factors accounting for 11.1% to 42.9%. Failures of neuraxial techniques accounted for less than 4% of the general anesthesia cases. There was only one case of difficult intubation and no anesthesia-related mortality was recorded.ConclusionThe use of general anesthesia for cesarean delivery is low and declining. These trends may reflect the early and increasing use of neuraxial techniques, particularly in parturients with co-existing morbidities. A significant reduction in exposure of trainees to obstetric general anesthesia has been observed.Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

18 keywords...

hide…