• H Schneck, M Scheller, R Wagner, B von Hundelshausen, and E Kochs.
• Department of Anesthesiology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany. Hajo.Schneck@Irz.tu-muenchen.de
• Anesth. Analg. 1999 Jan 1;88(1):63-6.

UnlabelledWe surveyed routine anesthetic practice and measures to prevent acid aspiration syndrome (AAS) in patients undergoing cesarean section (CS) throughout Germany. Of 1061 questionnaires, 81.9% were returned. For scheduled CS, general anesthesia was used in 63% of cases, and for urgent CS, it was used in 82% of cases. Regional anesthesia was used less often for both scheduled and urgent CS in smaller (< or =500 deliveries/yr; 28% and 16%, respectively) than in medium-sized (500-1000 deliveries/yr; 42% and 19%, respectively) or major obstetric departments (>1000 deliveries/yr; 45% and 21%, respectively). Among the regional techniques, epidural anesthesia (59%) was preferred more than spinal anesthesia (40%) in scheduled CS. In urgent CS, spinal anesthesia predominated (56% vs 42%). Pharmacological AAS prophylaxis is routinely used in 69% (68%) of departments before elective (urgent) CS under general anesthesia and in 52% under regional anesthesia. H2-blocking drugs are preferred for AAS prophylaxis over H2-blocker plus sodium citrate and sodium citrate alone. Both the incidence of and the mortality from AAS at CS are very low in Germany (<1 fatality per year). Nevertheless, AAS prophylaxis deserves more widespread use in obstetric anesthesia and in other patients at risk (e.g., children, outpatients).ImplicationsAccording to a countrywide survey, the use of regional anesthesia for cesarean section and pharmacological prophylaxis of acid aspiration syndrome is considerably less common in Germany than in the United States, United Kingdom, or other European countries.

18 keywords...

hide…