• Michael G Fehlings, Anick Nater, Juan J Zamorano, Lindsay A Tetreault, Peter P Varga, Ziya L Gokaslan, Stefano Boriani, Charles G Fisher, Laurence Rhines, Chetan Bettegowda, Norio Kawahara, and Dean Chou.
• *Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery and Spinal Program, University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada †Toronto Western Research Institute and Krembil Neuroscience Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada ‡Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada §National Center for Spinal Disorders and Buda Health Center, Budapest, Hungary ¶Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA ||Department of Degenerative and Oncological Spine Surgery, Rizzoli Institute, Bologna, Italy **Division of Spine, Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia and Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada ††Department of Neurosurgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA ‡‡Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University, Kahokugun, Japan §§Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
• Spine. 2016 Mar 1; 41 (5): 390-8.

Study DesignA retrospective analysis of 169 adult patients operated for a conventional spinal schwannoma from the AOSpine Multicenter Primary Spinal Tumors Database.ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to identify risk factors for local recurrence of conventional spinal schwannoma in patients who had surgery.Summary Of Background DataSchwannomas account for up to 30% of all adult spinal tumors. Total resection is the gold standard for patients with sensory or motor deficits. Local recurrence is reported to be approximately 5% and usually occurs several years after surgery.MethodsRates and time of local recurrence of spinal schwannoma were quantified. Predictive value of various clinical factors was assessed, including age, gender, tumor size, affected spinal segment, and type of surgery. Descriptive statistics and univariate regression analyses were performed.ResultsNine (5.32%) out the 169 patients in this study experienced local recurrence approximately 1.7 years postoperatively. Univariate analyses revealed that recurrence tended to occur more often in younger patients (39.33 ± 14.58 versus 47.01 ± 15.29 years) and in the lumbar segment (55.56%), although this did not reach significance [hazard ratio (HR) 0.96, P = 0.127; and P = 0.195, respectively]. Recurrence also arose in the cervical and sacral spine (22.22%, respectively) but not in the thoracic area. Tumors were significantly larger in patients with recurrence (6.97 ± 4.66  cm versus 3.81 ± 3.34  cm), with extent in the cranial caudal direction posing the greatest hazard (HR = 1.321, P = 0.002). The location of the tumor, whether epidural, intradural, or both (P = 0.246), was not significantly related to recurrence. Regarding surgical technique, over 4 times as many patients who underwent intralesional resection experienced a recurrence proportionally to patients who underwent en bloc resection (HR = 4.178, P = 0.033).ConclusionThe pre-operative size of the conventional spinal schwannoma and intralesional resection are the main risk factors for local postoperative recurrence.Level Of Evidence3.

42 keywords...

hide…