• T V Clancy, M W Ragozzino, D Ramshaw, M P Churchill, D L Covington, and J G Maxwell.
• Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.
• Am. J. Surg. 1993 Dec 1;166(6):680-4; discussion 684-5.

AbstractThe administration of oral contrast (OC) is widely recommended for computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen in patients with blunt trauma. The purpose of this study was to determine whether routine abdominal CT scans performed without OC were associated with diagnostic error in patients with blunt trauma. Four hundred ninety-two patients were identified from our Trauma Registry who had CT scans for the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma between January 1988 and December 1991. Seventy-six percent (372) of the CT scans were interpreted as negative, and 24% (120) were considered positive. OC was used in 8 (1.6%) of 492 patients. Only 1 of 372 patients whose initial non-OC--enhanced scan was negative subsequently required surgery. There were 5 bowel injuries among the 42 patients who underwent an abdominal operation; in none would the use of OC have ensured the preoperative diagnosis. We found that the omission of OC did not represent a disadvantage to patients with blunt trauma undergoing a routine abdominal CT scan. Potential time delays and the hazards associated with the use of OC were minimized.

19 keywords...

hide…