• Pelin Karaca, Admir Hadzic, Marina Yufa, Jerry D Vloka, Anthony R Brown, Alex Visan, Kevin Sanborn, and Alan C Santos.
• College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
• Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003 Sep 1; 28 (5): 380-3.

BackgroundConsiderable controversy exists over the relationship of paresthesia to nerve stimulation. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency with which patients report paresthesia at the point that an acceptable motor response is obtained to low-intensity current electrical stimulation.MethodsLow-intensity current nerve stimulation (0.6 mA, 200 microseconds, 2 Hz) was used to identify the brachial plexus in 64 consecutive patients having shoulder or arm surgery with an interscalene block. During nerve localization and while maintaining a motor response (0.20 mA-0.40 mA), the patients were queried regarding any radiating sensation or pain (paresthesia) in the shoulder or extremity on the side of the blockade. Sensory distribution of the block, motor strength of the arm muscles, and adequacy of anesthesia were used to assess the extent of blockade.ResultsNinety-five percent of patients had satisfactory surgical anesthesia. None of the patients spontaneously reported having a paresthesia during nerve stimulation. However, on careful questioning, half of the patients (55%) reported electrical paresthesia, defined as dull tingling sensation traveling down to their hands and coinciding with the motor response. In addition, most patients (71%) spontaneously reported having a mild, radiating paresthesia on initial injection of local anesthetic.ConclusionsPainful paresthesiae should be infrequent when a low-stimulating current is used to identify the neural components of the brachial plexus and when the block needle is advanced slowly. Low-current intensity nerve stimulation can be used to achieve successful interscalene block with minimal discomfort to the patient.

16 keywords...

hide…