• Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue · Mar 2011

    [Clinical observation of passive leg raising combined with non invasive cardiac output monitoring system in predicting volume responsiveness].

    • Hong-liang Wang, Hai-tao Liu, and Kai-jiang Yu.
    • Department of Intensive Care Unit, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, Heilongjiang, China.
    • Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2011 Mar 1;23(3):146-9.

    ObjectiveTo investigate whether passive leg raising (PLR) combined with ultrasonic cardiac output monitoring system (USCOM) could be used to predict the hemodynamic response to volume expansion (VE) in patients with spontaneous respiration.MethodsThe study was performed with prospective , cohort study method. Thirty three patients with spontaneous breathing activity who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) from October 2009 to April 2010 were included. Measurements of stroke volume (SV) were obtained with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and USCOM. Patients were considered to be responders to VE if SV(TTE) increased ≥ 15%. Based on the responsiveness of VE, all the patients were divided into responders and non responders. The change in SV (ΔSV) after the experiment and its correlation were observed.ResultsA total of 36 fluid load tests in 33 patients were evaluated resulting in 24 responders and 12 non responders. There was no significant difference between two groups in the clinical data and hemodynamics parameters at incipient stage when head side of bed was raised for 45 degrees angle.After PLR, the ΔSV(TTE) and ΔSV(USCOM) in responder group were significantly higher than those in non responder group [ΔSV(TTE): (21.7 ± 13.2)% vs. (4.8 ± 9.4)%,ΔSV(USCOM):(23.5 ± 13.0)% vs. (4.6 ± 8.9)%, both P <0.01], with positive correlation between ΔSV( TTE) and ΔSV(USCOM) ( r =0.792, P <0.01). After VE, the ΔSV(TTE)and ΔSV(USCOM) in responder group were significantly higher than those in non responder group [ΔSV(TTE): (27.3 ± 14.1)%vs.(7.2 ± 8.4)%,ΔSV(USCOM): (25.4 ± 13.8)% vs. (6.7 ± 8.6)%, both P <0.01], with positive correlation between ΔSV(TTE) and ΔSV(USCOM) ( r =0.855, P <0.01). The ΔSV(TTE) ≥ 15% during PLR was predictive of response to VE with a sensitivity of 100.0% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 85.0-100.0] and a specificity of 83.3% (95% CI 68.4-98.2). The ΔSV(USCOM)≥ 15% during PLR was predictive of response to VE with a sensitivity of 83.3% (95% CI 66.1-100.0) and a specificity of 94.4% (95% CI 83.9-100.0). There was no difference between the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for PLR induced ΔSV(TTE)and ΔSV(USCOM) (0.95 ± 0.04 vs. 0.93 ± 0.05, P>0.05).ConclusionPLR combined with USCOM can predict the hemodynamic response to VE in spontaneously breathing patients, and the procedure can be used to guide fluid therapy in spontaneously breathing patients.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,704,841 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.