• Jacob S Koruth, Marian K Rippy, Alexander Khairkhahan, David A Ligon, Christopher A Hubbard, Frederick St Goar, Randall Lee, Leonardo Ribeiro, Marc Miller, Srinivas Dukkipati, Petr Neuzil, and Vivek Y Reddy.
• Helmsley Electrophysiology Center, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
• J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2015 Mar 1; 26 (3): 322-8.

IntroductionIn this in vivo ovine study, we describe the course of pacing and sensing parameters during follow-up as well as the gross and histopathological features at the implant site of the recently described leadless cardiac pacemaker (LCP).Methods And ResultsAll sheep underwent LCP implantation in the right ventricular (RV) apex. Serial pacing/sensing thresholds were assessed. In the first cohort, 11 animals were followed up for a period of 3 months, followed by necropsy. In the second cohort, 7 additional sheep were followed for a period of up to 18 months. Mean pacing and sensing thresholds in the 3-month cohort were 1.0 ± 0.5 V and 9.0 ± 3.7 mV at implant, and 0.7 ± 0.2 V and 8.1 ± 3.9 mV at 90 days, respectively. At necropsy at 3 months, all devices were securely implanted at the RV apex without extrusion of helix beyond the RV wall. Besides endocardial reactive changes in the RV apex surrounding the distal portion of the LCP, there were no other grossly visible abnormalities. In the second cohort (7 sheep), mean pacing and sensing thresholds were 1.0 ± 0.5 V and 9.9 ± 3.8 mV at implant, and 0.86 ± 0.4 V and 4.25 ± 1 mV, respectively, at 18 months of follow-up.ConclusionWe demonstrate that after implantation of the LCP, pacing/sensing parameters remain adequate up to 18 months in follow-up. In addition, pathological changes at the implant site and within the RV are limited in severity at 90 days, supporting the efficacy and safety of this novel approach to pacing.© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

18 keywords...

hide…