• Lancet Respir Med · Dec 2014

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    The effect of long-term macrolide treatment on respiratory microbiota composition in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis: an analysis from the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled BLESS trial.

    • Geraint B Rogers, Kenneth D Bruce, Megan L Martin, Lucy D Burr, and David J Serisier.
    • Infection and Immunity Theme, South Australia Health and Medical Research Institute, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, Australia; School of Medicine, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
    • Lancet Respir Med. 2014 Dec 1;2(12):988-96.

    BackgroundLong-term macrolide treatment has proven benefit in inflammatory airways diseases, but whether it leads to changes in the composition of respiratory microbiota is unknown. We aimed to assess whether long-term, low-dose erythromycin treatment changes the composition of respiratory microbiota in people with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis.MethodsMicrobiota composition was determined by 16S rRNA gene sequencing of sputum samples from participants in the BLESS trial, a 12-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of twice-daily erythromycin ethylsuccinate (400 mg) in adult patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis and at least two infective exacerbations in the preceding year. The primary outcome was within-patient change in respiratory microbiota composition (assessed by Bray-Curtis index) between baseline and week 48, comparing erythromycin with placebo. The BLESS trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12608000460303.FindingsThe BLESS trial took place between Oct 15, 2008, and Dec 14, 2011. Paired sputum samples were available from 86 randomly assigned patients, 42 in the placebo group and 44 in the erythromycin group. The change in microbiota composition between baseline and week 48 was significantly greater with erythromycin than with placebo (median Bray-Curtis score 0·52 [IQR 0·14-0·78] vs 0·68 [0·46-0·93]; median difference 0·16, 95% CI 0·01-0·33; p=0·03). In patients with baseline airway infection dominated by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, erythromycin did not change microbiota composition significantly. In those with infection dominated by organisms other than P. aeruginosa, erythromycin caused a significant change in microbiota composition (p=0·03 [by analysis of similarity]), representing a reduced relative abundance of Haemophilus influenzae (35·3% [5·5-91·6] vs 6·7% [0·8-74·8]; median difference 12·6%, 95% CI 0·4-28·3; p=0·04; interaction p=0·02) and an increased relative abundance of P aeruginosa (0·02% [0·00-0·33] vs 0·13% [0·01-39·58]; median difference 6·6%, 95% CI 0·1-37·1; p=0·002; interaction p=0·45). Compared with placebo, erythromycin reduced the rate of pulmonary exacerbations over the 48 weeks of the study in patients with P. aeruginosa-dominated infection (median 1 [IQR 0-3] vs 3 [2-5]; median difference -2, 95% CI -4 to -1; p=0·01), but not in those without P. aeruginosa-dominated infection (1 [0-2] vs 1 [0-3]; median difference 0, -1 to 0; p=0·41; interaction p=0·04).InterpretationLong-term erythromycin treatment changes the composition of respiratory microbiota in patients with bronchiectasis. In patients without P. aeruginosa airway infection, erythromycin did not significantly reduce exacerbations and promoted displacement of H. influenzae by more macrolide-tolerant pathogens including P. aeruginosa. These findings argue for a cautious approach to chronic macrolide use in patients without P. aeruginosa airway infection.FundingMater Adult Respiratory Research Trust Fund.Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…