• Sang-Yeol Ma, Hyun Dong Je, Ji Hoon Jeong, Hae-Young Kim, and Hyeong-Dong Kim.
• Department of Physical Therapy, Masan University, Changwon, Gyeongnam, Republic of Korea.
• Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Jan 1;94(1):9-16.

ObjectiveTo compare 2 different treatment approaches, physical therapy modalities, and joint mobilization versus whole-body cryotherapy (WBC) combined with physical therapy modalities and joint mobilization, for symptoms of adhesive capsulitis (AC) of the shoulder.DesignA randomized trial.SettingHospital.ParticipantsPatients with AC of the shoulder (N=30).InterventionPatients were randomly assigned to 2 groups. The WBC group received physical therapy modalities, passive joint mobilization of the shoulder, and WBC, whereas the non-WBC group received only physical therapy modalities and passive joint mobilization of the shoulder.Main Outcome MeasuresVisual analog scale (VAS), active range of motion (ROM) of flexion, abduction, internal and external rotation of the shoulder, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) were measured before and after the intervention.ResultsA statistically significant difference between groups was found for the VAS, active ROM of flexion, abduction, internal rotation, and external rotation, and the ASES with greater improvements in the WBC group (Ps<.01). Overall, both groups showed a significant improvement in all outcome measures and ROM measures from pre to post at a level of P<.01.ConclusionsThere is significant improvement with the addition of WBC to treatment interventions in this sample of patients.Copyright © 2013 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

20 keywords...

hide…