• Antonis A Pitsis, Aikaterini N Visouli, and Visouli N Aikaterini.
• St Luke's Hospital, Panorama, Thessaloniki, Greece. apitsis@otenet.gr
• Curr Opin Crit Care. 2011 Oct 1;17(5):425-38.

Purpose Of ReviewCardiogenic shock still has a grave prognosis. We present the recent advances in mechanical circulatory support (MCS) for the treatment of refractory cardiogenic shock.Recent FindingsThe contraindications for short-term MCS in rapid-onset cardiogenic shock are becoming fewer and the threshold for its application has been progressively lowered. Short-term MCS is increasingly used in refractory cardiac arrest and will be probably integrated as the last means in the advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation algorithm (provided there is experienced team and technical support). Improved device technology has contributed to improved results of long-term MCS. Emergent application of long-term MCS in patients with critical cardiogenic shock after a long history of progressively deteriorating end-stage chronic heart failure should be interpreted as delayed application associated with increased mortality.SummaryAlthough MCS can be life saving in cardiogenic shock, the results are still suboptimal. Mortality is associated with the critical presupport state and the adverse events during MCS. Early initiation of support that meets the patient's requirements, potent support in the early phase, adverse event prevention, global combined management (surgical, interventional, medical), balanced support duration, bridging to further therapeutic modalities including heart transplantation or longer-term support, and advanced technology could offer improved results.

14 keywords...

hide…