• Armine G Minasian, Frank J J van den Elshout, P N Richard Dekhuijzen, Petra J E Vos, Frank F Willems, Paul J P C van den Bergh, and Yvonne F Heijdra.
• Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Rijnstate Hospital, Wagnerlaan 55, 6815 AD Arnhem, The Netherlands. aminasian@rijnstate.nl
• Heart Lung. 2013 Sep 1;42(5):365-71.

BackgroundUsing a fixed ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 s to forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) < 0.70 instead of the lower limit of normal (LLN) to define chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may lead to overdiagnosis of COPD in elderly patients with heart failure (HF) and consequently unnecessary treatment with possible adverse health effects.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to determine COPD prevalence in patients with chronic HF according to two definitions of airflow obstruction.MethodsSpirometry was performed in 187 outpatients with stable chronic HF without pulmonary congestion who had a left ventricular ejection fraction <40% (mean age 69 ± 10 years, 78% men). COPD diagnosis was confirmed 3 months after standard treatment with tiotropium in newly diagnosed COPD patients.ResultsCOPD prevalence varied substantially between 19.8% (LLN-COPD) and 32.1% (GOLD-COPD). Twenty-three of 60 patients (38.3%) with GOLD-COPD were potentially misclassified as having COPD (FEV1/FVC < 0.7 but > LLN). In contrast to patients with LLN-COPD, potentially misclassified patients did not differ significantly from those without COPD regarding respiratory symptoms and risk factors for COPD.ConclusionsOne fifth, rather than one third, of the patients with chronic HF had concomitant COPD using the LLN instead of the fixed ratio. LLN may identify clinically more important COPD than a fixed ratio of 0.7.Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

62 keywords...

hide…