-
- M A DeVita, Y Friedman, and V Petrella.
- Department of Anesthesiology/CCM, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
- Crit Care Clin. 1993 Jan 1;9(1):137-51.
AbstractFMCPAP and NCPAP therapy is an effective modality for treating patients with PCP, hypoxia, and respiratory insufficiency. The therapy decreases intrapulmonary shunting and improves oxygenation. It is safe and, in some cases, can be provided outside of an intensive care unit. The major benefit of MCPAP is that it postpones (and sometimes obviates) the need for intubation and mechanical ventilation. This may provide adequate time for a trial of therapy, education, ethical discussions, and completion of personal matters by patients. It is conceivable that failure to respond to MCPAP may provide prognostic information to help guide further therapy. Further outcome studies are needed to clarify this issue. Adding MCPAP to mechanical ventilation and conventional mask oxygen therapy increases the options that practitioners can use to provide the best titrated care for their patients.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..