• Neuro-oncology · Oct 2014

    Review

    Pros and cons of current brain tumor imaging.

    • Benjamin M Ellingson, Patrick Y Wen, Martin J van den Bent, and Timothy F Cloughesy.
    • Department of Radiological Sciences (B.M.E.), Department of Biomedical Physics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA (B.M.E.); Department of Bioengineering, Henry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied Science at UCLA (B.M.E.); Brain Research Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA (B.M.E., T.F.C.); UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California (B.M.E., T.F.C.); Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (P.Y.W.); Department of Neuro-Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands (M.J.v.d.B.); Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California (T.F.C.).
    • Neuro-oncology. 2014 Oct 1;16 Suppl 7:vii2-11.

    AbstractOver the past 20 years, very few agents have been approved for the treatment of brain tumors. Recent studies have highlighted some of the challenges in assessing activity in novel agents for the treatment of brain tumors. This paper reviews some of the key challenges related to assessment of tumor response to therapy in adult high-grade gliomas and discusses the strengths and limitations of imaging-based endpoints. Although overall survival is considered the "gold standard" endpoint in the field of oncology, progression-free survival and response rate are endpoints that hold great value in neuro-oncology. Particular focus is given to advancements made since the January 2006 Brain Tumor Endpoints Workshop, including the development of Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria, the value of T2/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, use of objective response rates and progression-free survival in clinical trials, and the evaluation of pseudoprogression, pseudoresponse, and inflammatory response in radiographic images.© The Author(s) 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.