• Ponlapat Rojnuckarin, Walee Chanthawibun, Jureeporn Noiphrom, Narumol Pakmanee, and Tanin Intragumtornchai.
• Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Rama IV Road, Patumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand. fmedprn@md2.md.chula.ac.th
• Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2006 Sep 1;100(9):879-84.

AbstractAlthough systemic administration of antivenom can promptly reverse coagulopathy, efficacy on local effects of viper venom remains to be determined. Currently, there has been no proven specific treatment for snakebite patients with severe local effects. This study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients bitten by green pit vipers (Trimeresurus albolabris or T. macrops) with marked limb swelling, but no severe coagulopathy requiring antivenom, were randomized to receive either equine F(ab')2 antivenom, or placebo. Twenty-eight cases were included, 14 in each group, and they had their limb circumferences measured on days 1, 2, 4 and 6 after interventions. The percentage reduction in limb circumference was significantly better in the antivenom group compared with the placebo group (ANOVA, P = 0.03), especially in the first 24 h (1.14 vs. 3.62%, in placebo and antivenom group, respectively, P = 0.014). The reduction in pain score was similar. The plasma venom levels were not different at presentation but lower in the antivenom group 24h after intervention (P = 0.033). These data suggest that intravenous antivenom could accelerate local oedema resolution in humans. However, the degree is not clinically significant, and, therefore, general use is not recommended.

25 keywords...

hide…