• Matthew Sibbald, Daniel Panisko, and Rodrigo B Cavalcanti.
• Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, Canada. mattsibbald@gmail.com
• Med Educ. 2011 Apr 1;45(4):415-21.

ContextClinical context may act as both an aid to decision making and a source of bias contributing to medical error. The effect of clinical history, a form of clinical context, on the diagnostic accuracy of the physical examination is unknown.MethodsWe randomised internal medicine residents to receive either no history or a short stem suggestive of one of six cardiac valvular diagnoses prior to a 10-minute objective structured clinical examination station assessing cardiac examination skills using a high-fidelity simulator. Clinical performance and diagnostic accuracy were compared using a standardised checklist.ResultsA total of 159 internal medicine residents were enrolled after providing informed consent. Of these, 80% arrived at the correct diagnosis, with diagnostic accuracy varying significantly by valve lesion (49-100%; p < 0.0001). Clinical context was associated with improved diagnostic accuracy compared with no history (90% versus 74%; likelihood ratio= 6.6, p < 0.0001), but was not associated with trainees' ability to identify and characterise physical findings. Among residents given clinical context, higher diagnostic accuracy was only achieved by those able to correctly predict the diagnosis from the history.ConclusionsClinical context is associated with enhanced diagnostic accuracy of common valvular lesions. However, this effect seems linked to heuristic hypothesis generation and may predispose to premature diagnostic closure, anchoring and confirmation bias.© Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2011.

17 keywords...

hide…