• J Laryngol Otol · Oct 2012

    Achieving flying colours in surgical safety: audit of World Health Organization 'Surgical Safety Checklist' compliance.

    • Y Sheena, J M Fishman, C Nortcliff, T Mawby, A F Jefferis, and N R Bleach.
    • Department of Otolaryngology, Wexham Park Hospital, Slough, UK.
    • J Laryngol Otol. 2012 Oct 1;126(10):1049-55.

    ObjectiveThe World Health Organization 'Surgical Safety Checklist' has been adopted by UK surgical units following National Patient Safety Agency guidance. Our aim was to assess compliance with our local version of this Checklist.MethodsOtolaryngology trainee doctors prospectively assessed compliance with the local Checklist over a six-week period. A staff educational intervention was implemented and the audit was repeated 12 months later.ResultsA total of 72 cases were assessed. The initial audit found that: 44 per cent of procedures were undocumented at 'Sign in'; 'Time out' was inappropriately interrupted in 39 per cent of cases; the procedure started before Checklist completion in 33 per cent of cases; and the 'Sign out' was not read out in 94 per cent of cases and was not fully documented in 42 per cent of cases. Following education, re-audit indicated that overall compliance had improved from 63.7 per cent (± 8.9 per cent standard error of the mean) to 90.4 per cent (± 2.7 per cent standard error of the mean).ConclusionOur completed audit cycle demonstrated a significant improvement in Checklist compliance following educational intervention. We discuss barriers to compliance, as well as strategies for quality improvement, and we call for other surgeons to similarly publish their Checklist experience and assess its impact on surgical outcomes.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…