• M van de Velde, A Teunkens, M Hanssens, F A van Assche, and E Vandermeersch.
• Department of Anaesthesiology, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven and University Hospitals Gasthuisberg, Belgium.
• Anaesth Intensive Care. 2001 Dec 1;29(6):595-9.

AbstractA retrospective review of obstetric anaesthesia charts was performed for all parturients receiving regional anaesthesia over a 22-month period. The incidence of headache, post dural puncture headache (PDPH) and various other complications of regional anaesthesia that had been prospectively assessed were noted, as was the anaesthetic technique used (epidural or combined spinal epidural (CSE)). PDPH was rare (0.44%) and occurred with similar frequency in those managed with either epidural or CSE anaesthesia or analgesia. The pencil-point spinal needle gauge (27 or 29) did not influence the incidence of PDPH. Following a CSE technique, the epidural catheter more reliably produced effective analgesia/anaesthesia as compared with a standard epidural technique (1.49% versus 3.18% incidence of replaced catheters respectively). We conclude, based on the results of this retrospective review, that CSE is acceptable with respect to the occurrence of PDPH and that it is possible it is advantageous in relation to the correct placement of the epidural catheter

25 keywords...

hide…