• Am J Emerg Med · Jul 2000

    Accuracy of ED sonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

    • S C Chen, H P Wang, H Y Hsu, P M Huang, and F Y Lin.
    • Department of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, ROC. scc@ha.mc.ntu.edu.tw
    • Am J Emerg Med. 2000 Jul 1;18(4):449-52.

    AbstractThe objective was to compare the accuracy of abdominal sonography performed by emergency physicians in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis with that of the surgeons' clinical impression. Three hundred-seventeen patients with right lower abdominal pain admitted to the Department of Emergency Medicine at National Taiwan University Hospital in Taipei, Taiwan were prospectively included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups according to the time of day they visited the emergency department. Those patients visiting the emergency department during the day were included in group I and those during the night were in group II. Group I was diagnosed by sonography. Group II was diagnosed by surgeons' clinical impression without sonographic examination. The definitive diagnosis of acute appendicitis was confirmed by the pathological reports. In the diagnosis of acute appendicitis, group I had a sensitivity of 96.4%, a specificity of 67.6%, a positive predictive value of 89.8%, a negative predictive value of 86.2%, and an accuracy of 89.1%, and group II had a sensitivity of 86.2%, a specificity of 37.0%, a positive predictive value of 74.6%, a negative predictive value of 55.6%, and an accuracy of 70.6%. The overall accuracy of sonography performed by emergency physicians in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis was superior to that of the surgeons' clinical impression.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.