• J Pain · May 2005

    Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial

    Effects of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist dextromethorphan on temporal summation of pain are similar in fibromyalgia patients and normal control subjects.

    • Roland Staud, Charles J Vierck, Michael E Robinson, and Donald D Price.
    • Department of Medicine, McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 326100-0221, USA. staudr@ufl.edu
    • J Pain. 2005 May 1;6(5):323-32.

    UnlabelledTemporal summation of second pain at least partly reflects temporal summation of dorsal horn neuronal responses, and both have been termed windup (WU), a form of nociception-dependent central sensitization. Animal and human experiments have shown that both forms of WU depend on N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and substance P receptor systems. WU of second pain (WU(SP)) in patients with fibromyalgia (FM) is enhanced compared with normal control (NC) subjects and is followed by exaggerated WU(SP) aftersensations and prolonged WU(SP) maintenance at low stimulus frequencies. Because the enhanced WU(SP) of FM patients could be related to abnormal endogenous modulation of NDMA receptors, we tested the effects of the NMDA receptor antagonist dextromethorphan (DEX) on WU(SP) in FM and NC subjects in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. WU(SP) was elicited by trains of 0.7-second duration thermal pulses applied to the glabrous surface of the hands or by 1-second mechanical stimuli to the adductor pollicis muscle of the hands at a frequency of 0.33 Hz. In comparison to baseline and placebo conditions, single oral doses of DEX 60 and 90 mg reduced thermal and mechanical WU(SP) in NC and FM subjects, with DEX 90 mg being most effective. These effects did not differ for male and female NC subjects. FM subjects required less thermal and mechanical stimulus intensity than NC to achieve maximal WU(SP), but the extent of WU(SP) reduction by DEX did not statistically differ between NC and FM subjects for all study conditions. Thus, central pain processing of FM subjects is not different from NC in at least one important aspect, namely their NMDA receptor system responsiveness to pharmacologic inhibition by DEX.PerspectiveResults of this study demonstrate that FM patients show abnormal WU(SP) during thermal and mechanical stimulation compared with NC. Because oral doses of the NMDA receptor antagonist DEX attenuated thermal and mechanical WU(SP) similarly in FM patients and NC, other mechanisms than WU(SP) need to be considered for the widespread pain of FM patients. These mechanisms might include tonic nociceptive input from peripheral tissues and/or enhanced descending facilitation.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.