• W Oczenski, S Schwarz, and R D Fitzgerald.
• Abteilung für Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin, Ludwig Boltzmann Institut für Medizinökonomie in Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin, Krankenhaus der Stadt Wien-Lainz, Wien. wolfgang.oczenski@wienkav.at
• Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2004 Aug 1;39(8):463-70.

AbstractIn patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), recruitment maneuvers have been proposed as an adjunct to mechanical ventilation to open up atelectasis and to keep these alveoli open by the application of adequate high levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). Though several studies reported that the responsiveness to recruitment maneuvers resulted in a marked improvement of oxygenation with a concomitant decrease in airway pressure and/or inspiratory fraction of oxygen, the performance of recruitment maneuvers still remains a matter of dispute, especially in patients ventilated with a lung protective ventilation strategy. In this review we discuss the pathophysiological background, factors affecting the responsiveness to recruitment maneuvers and their clinical impact in the light of recently published studies. Successful recruitment depends on several factors like the applied recruitment pressure, the level of PEEP set before and after the recruitment maneuver, the stage and the underlying disease of the ARDS, chest wall mechanics and the transpulmonary pressure as well as the positioning of the patient. Regarding the current literature, recruitment maneuvers may be considered as a rescue therapy in the early stage of severe hypoxemic lung failure, if a lung protective ventilation strategy and other additive adjuncts like prone positioning or the application of inhaled vasodilators failed to induce adequate gas exchange.

14 keywords...

hide…