• Spine · Mar 2007

    Reliability of 3D reconstruction of the spine of mild scoliotic patients.

    • Olivier Gille, Nicolas Champain, Abdelkrim Benchikh-El-Fegoun, Jean-Marc Vital, and Wafa Skalli.
    • University Hospital of Bordeaux, Spinal Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Bordeaux, France. olivier.gille@chu-bordeaux.fr
    • Spine. 2007 Mar 1;32(5):568-73.

    Study DesignA reliability study was conducted in quantitative 3-dimensional (3D) measurements for mild scoliosis.ObjectiveTo evaluate the intrarater and interrater reliability of a computer tool used for 3D reconstruction of the spine.Summary Of Background DataNo reliability study of spinal in vivo 3D medical imaging measurements has been performed in the literature.MethodsThis study included 30 patients (mean age 13 years) with mild idiopathic scoliosis. Spinal 3D reconstruction was performed using a new technique called semiautomatic 3D reconstruction, which requires only the location of the corners of each vertebral body on 2 orthogonal views. Three raters performed the 3D reconstruction procedure on the 30 pairs of radiographs in random order. One of the raters repeated the procedure for the 30 patients 15 days later. Inter-reliability and intra-reliability were estimated for different parameters: thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, Cobb's angle, pelvic morphologic and positional parameters, and axial rotation.ResultsIntraclass correlation coefficient showed good or very good agreement for most of the measurements. The 95% prediction limits are approximately 4 degrees for the measurements of spinal curves, 2 degrees for pelvic parameters, and axial vertebral rotation.ConclusionsThe reliability of 3D reconstruction of the spine is acceptable, and this technique can be used for clinical studies.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.