• Robert I Hacker, Garry Ritter, Chris Nelson, Denis Knobel, Kristen Hopkins, Corrado P Marini, and Rafael Barrera.
• NSLIJHS- Hofstra-North Shore LIJ, School of Medicine Program, Department of Surgery, NY 11040, USA.
• J Crit Care. 2012 Jun 1;27(3):250-4.

IntroductionProphylaxis for venous thromboembolic disease continues to pose a challenging management problem in postoperative neurosurgical patients, particularly those in the intensive care unit (ICU). This study evaluates neurosurgical patients admitted to the surgical ICU (SICU) at a tertiary hospital and compared those who had received subcutaneous unfractionated heparin (SQUFH) to those who did not. This study was conducted to better evaluate if the administration of SQUFH to neurosurgical patients is safe and whether the administration of SQUFH is an independent risk factor for bleeding in this patient population.MethodsRetrospective analysis was performed on prospectively collected data on all postoperative neurosurgical patients admitted over the course of 11 years to the SICU at Long Island Jewish Medical Center. This study included neurosurgical patients who received SQUFH and those who did not. Data acquired included demographic information, hemodynamic monitoring, pharmacologic interventions, laboratory results, and survival outcomes as well as occurrences of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and pulmonary embolism. Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin for venous thromboembolic prophylaxis were dosed according to previously established literature based hospital protocols. Data were analyzed by χ(2), Fisher exact test, Mann-Whitney U test, or the product limit method, where appropriate.ResultsFive hundred twenty-two neurosurgical patients were included in the study. Two hundred thirteen patients (40.8%) with mean age of 58 years received SQUFH (133 patients received SQUFH within 24 hours of surgery and 80 patients received SQUFH 24 hours postoperatively). Once SQUFH was initiated, it was continued until discharge from the hospital. Three hundred nine patients (59.2%) with mean age 57.8 years received no anticoagulation. In the SQUFH patient population, 72 patients (33.8%) had a diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage compared with 125 patients (40.5%) from the group who had not received anticoagulation. There was no significant difference in ICU length of stay between the groups, 5.8 ± 5.4 (no deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis), and those receiving SQUFH, 6.7 ± 6.1 (over 24 hours) and 5.9 ± 4.8 (over 24 hours). No postoperative hemorrhages were observed (confirmed by computed tomography of the brain) in any of the neurosurgical patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage, or subdural or epidural hemorrhage. No instances of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) were observed.ConclusionsAdministration of SQUFH dosed according to the risk for thromboembolism does not appear to contribute to postoperative hemorrhage in neurosurgical patients. This study supports the concept that the administration of SQUFH is safe in postoperative neurosurgical population.Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

29 keywords...

hide…