• A McCluskey, G Meakin, J M Hopkinson, and R D Baker.
• Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Pendlebury, UK.
• Anaesthesia. 1997 Apr 1;52(4):345-9.

AbstractIn order to compare an acceleromyograph (TOF-Guard) with a mechanomyograph (Grass FT03), the dose-response relationship of rocuronium was simultaneously determined in both arms of 15 children aged 3-11 years during anaesthesia with thiopentone, alfentanil and nitrous oxide. Three subgroups of five children received rocuronium 120, 180 or 240 micrograms.kg-1 randomly. The effective doses to produce 50% and 95% depression of the first twitch of the train-of-four determined by acceleromyography were 206 and 337 micrograms.kg-1, respectively, while these values determined by mechanomyography were 151 and 331 micrograms.kg-1, respectively. The dose-response curve obtained by acceleromyography was steeper and shifted to the right compared with that obtained by mechanomyography (p < 0.0001). The difference between the effective dose producing 50% twitch depression determined by the two devices was highly significant (p < 0.0001). In 13 out of 15 children, the acceleromyograph control train-of-four ratio was significantly greater than unity. Although there was a good correlation (r = 0.85) between simultaneous pairs of measurements of neuromuscular block, the acceleromyograph exhibited a bias of -25% relative to the mechanomyograph with wide limits of agreement (-62 to +12%). We conclude that acceleromyographic and mechanomyographic measurements should not be used interchangeably when determining the potency of muscle relaxants.

18 keywords...

hide…