-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic (transabdominal preperitoneal-TAPP) versus open (mesh) repair for bilateral and recurrent inguinal hernia: incidence of chronic groin pain and impact on quality of life: results of 10 year follow-up.
- M Bignell, G Partridge, D Mahon, and M Rhodes.
- Department of General Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.
- Hernia. 2012 Dec 1;16(6):635-40.
PurposeThe incidence of chronic groin pain (CGP) and its impact on quality of life (QoL) after hernia repair are not clear with follow-up either being short or retrospective. We present 10-year prospective follow-up of a randomized trial for bilateral and recurrent hernia repair focusing on CGP and its impact on QoL.MethodsPatients enrolled between 1997 and 2000 were contacted by telephone and asked about the presence of CGP. Those patients with CGP were sent two validated questionnaires: a SF-12v2 Health Survey and a Pain Impact Questionnaire (PIQ-6) (QualityMetric, USA).ResultsOne hundred and twenty patients were recruited into the original study, and of these, 14 complained of CGP and were sent a PIQ-6 and a SF-12 v2 health survey. Overall, there was a higher incidence of CGP in the laparoscopic group compared with the open group (15 vs. 8 %, ns), but the severity of the pain in the laparoscopic group was less (2 vs. 3.5, p = 0.0558). QoL was significantly reduced in patients with CGP compared with the US norm. The laparoscopic group scored higher in 5 out of 8 of the QoL categories compared with the open group, but this was not significant. Overall age-adjusted scores revealed those under 65 years of age felt they had poorer physical health, and this reduced their QoL compared to normal values.ConclusionCGP following laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair is less severe than open repair, but this does not translate into a significant improvement in QoLin this study.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.