-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
International Multicenter Study on the Impact of Extracapsular Lymph Node Involvement in Primary Surgery Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus on Overall Survival and Staging Systems.
- Philippe R Nafteux, Antoon M Lerut, Johnny Moons, Arnulf H Hölscher, Elfriede Bollschweiler, Mark I van Berge Henegouwen, Sjoerd M Lagarde, Jan J van Lanschot, Mathieu Messager, Christophe Mariette, Xavier B D'Journo, Pascal A Thomas, and Paul R De Leyn.
- *University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium †Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Tumorchirurgie, Cologne, Germany ‡Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands §Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands ¶Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, University Hospital Claude Huriez, Regional University Hospital Center, Lille, France ||Aix-Marseille University and Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France.
- Ann. Surg. 2015 Nov 1;262(5):809-15; discussion 815-6.
ObjectiveThe current pathological lymph node (pN) staging is based on the number of positive lymph nodes but does not take into consideration characteristics of the involved lymph nodes itself. The current study aims to examine the prognostic value of extracapsular lymph node involvement (EC-LNI) and intracapsular lymph node involvement (IC-LNI) for esophageal adenocarcinoma treated by primary surgery.MethodsFrom the databases of five European high volume centers, 1639 adenocarcinoma patients with primary R0-resection were withheld after excluding 90-day mortality. Oncologic variables, including number of resected lymph nodes, number of resected positive lymph nodes, and EC-LNI/IC-LNI were examined. The Union Internationale contre le Cancer (UICC) 7th edition prognostic staging was used as baseline staging system. Statistical analysis was performed by Cox proportional hazards modeling and verified using the Random Survival Forest technique.ResultsEC-LNI showed significantly worse overall 5-year survival compared with IC-LNI overall (13.4% vs 37.2%, P < 0.0001), including in each pN-category [16.4% vs 45.6% in pN1 (P < 0.0001), 16.1% vs 23.8% (P = 0.047) in pN2 (P = 0.065), and 8.7% vs 26.3% in pN3 categories, respectively]. pN1 IC-LNI patients show a 5-year overall survival comparable (P = 0.92) with stage IIB (ie, pT3N0). Reclassifying the UICC prognostic stages according to these findings into an adapted staging model showed a significant (P < 0.0001) increase in homogeneity, discriminatory ability, and monotonicity compared with the original UICC TNM 7th edition prognostic staging.ConclusionsThese data suggest that lymph node capsular status is an important prognostic factor and should be considered for the future edition of the TNM staging system for esophageal cancer.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.