• M G Conzemius, C M Hill, J L Sammarco, and S Z Perkowski.
• Department of Clinical Studies, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104-6010, USA.
• J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1997 Jun 1;210(11):1619-22.

ObjectiveTo determine the association between subjective and objective variables commonly used to evaluate severity of postoperative pain in dogs.DesignProspective double-blind study.Animals36 dogs with unilateral rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament that underwent surgery to stabilize the stifle.ProcedureEach dog was assessed to determine severity of pain before and after surgery, using various subjective and objective criteria.ResultsSubjective measures of pain (scores for visual analogue and numerical rating scales) correlated poorly or were not correlated with heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure, and results of a pain threshold test. Scores for visual analogue and numerical rating scales correlated with each other and with the amount of vocalization at most time periods.Clinical ImplicationsWe detected a weak association between commonly employed subjective and objective measures of pain. This indicated that some of these measurement techniques do not predictably reflect severity of postoperative pain in dogs. Therefore, clinicians should not rely too heavily on these variables when assessing severity of postoperative pain in dogs.

35 keywords...

hide…