• Journal of critical care · Feb 2016

    Finding the red flags: Swallowing difficulties after cardiac surgery in patients with prolonged intubation.

    • Emma Daly, Anna Miles, Samantha Scott, and Michael Gillham.
    • The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. Electronic address: edal913@aucklanduni.ac.nz.
    • J Crit Care. 2016 Feb 1; 31 (1): 119-24.

    PurposeThis retrospective audit set out to identify referral rates, swallowing characteristics, and risk factors for dysphagia and silent aspiration in at-risk patients after cardiac surgery. Dysphagia and silent aspiration are associated with poorer outcomes post cardiac surgery.MethodsOne hundred ninety patients who survived cardiac surgery and received more than 48 hours of intubation were included. Preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative information was collected.ResultsForty-one patients (22%) were referred to speech-language pathology for a swallowing assessment. Twenty-four of these patients (13%) underwent instrumental swallowing assessment, and silent aspiration was observed in 17 (70% of patients diagnosed as having dysphagia via instrumental assessment). Multilogistic analysis revealed previous stroke (P < .05), postoperative stroke (P < .001), and tracheostomy (P < .001) independently associated with dysphagia. The odds ratio for being diagnosed as having pneumonia, if a patient was diagnosed as having dysphagia, was 3.3.ConclusionsPatients identified with dysphagia after cardiac surgery had a high incidence of silent aspiration and increased risk of pneumonia. However, referral rates were low in this at-risk patient group. Early identification and ongoing assessment and appropriate management of dysphagic patients by a speech-language pathologist are strongly recommended.Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…