• J L Blackshear, B S Stambler, W E Strauss, D Roy, V C Dias, C L Beach, and M K Ebener.
• Mayo Clinic Jacksonville and St. Luke's Hospital, Florida 32224, USA.
• Am. J. Cardiol. 1996 Dec 1;78(11):1246-50.

AbstractWe tested whether patients presenting with atrial fibrillation (AF) or flutter (AFl) with a rapid ventricular response could maintain control of heart rate while transferring from a bolus and continuous infusion of intravenous diltiazem to oral diltiazem. Forty patients with AF or AFI and sustained ventricular rate > or = 120 beats/min received intravenous diltiazem "bolus" (20 to 25 mg for 2 minutes) and "infusion" (5 to 15 mg/hour for 6 to 20 hours). Oral long-acting diltiazem (diltiazem CD 180, 300, or 360 mg/24 hours) was administered in patients in whom stable heart rate control was attained during constant infusion. Intravenous diltiazem infusion was discontinued 4 hours after the first oral dose, and patients were monitored during 48 subsequent hours of "transition" to oral therapy. Response to diltiazem was defined as heart rate <100 beats/min, > or = 20% decrease in heart rate from baseline, or conversion to sinus rhythm. Other rate control or antiarrhythmic medications were not allowed during the study period. Thirty-seven of 40 patients maintained heart rate control during the bolus, and 35 of the remaining 37 maintained control during the infusion of intravenous diltiazem. Of the 35 patients achieving heart rate control with intravenous diltiazem who entered the transition to oral therapy, 27 maintained heart rate control (response rate of 77%/, 95% confidence interval 63% to 91%). The median infusion rate of intravenous diltiazem was 10 mg/hour, and the median dose of oral diltiazem CD was 300 mg/day. Oral long-acting diltiazem was 77% effective in controlling ventricular response over 48 hours in patients with AF or AFl in whom ventricular response was initially controlled with intravenous diltiazem.

23 keywords...

hide…