• T Gillow, S M Scotcher, J Deutsch, A While, and M P Quinlan.
• Victoria Eye Hospital, Hereford, England. steve@scotcher.freeserve.co.uk
• Ophthalmology. 1999 Nov 1;106(11):2173-7.

ObjectiveTo determine whether the routine use of supplementary intracameral lidocaine has any benefit over topical anesthesia alone when performing phacoemulsification surgery.DesignA prospective single-center, randomized, double-masked, clinical trial.ParticipantsA total of 204 patients undergoing phacoemulsification surgery with lens implantation under planned topical anesthesia.MethodsPatients were randomly allocated to receive either topical anesthesia plus 0.5 ml intracameral balanced salt solution or topical anesthesia plus 0.5 ml preservative-free 1% intracameral lidocaine.Main Outcome MeasuresOn the day after surgery, patients were asked to document the discomfort they had experienced using a visual analog scale. Intraoperative discomfort, postoperative discomfort, and discomfort caused by the microscope light were assessed.ResultsMultiple linear regression analysis did not show any significant relationship between the use of intracameral lidocaine and either intraoperative (P = 0.34) or postoperative (P = 0.45) pain scores. There was a small reduction in the discomfort caused by the operating microscope when intracameral lidocaine was used (P = 0.04).ConclusionsIn this study, the routine use of intracameral lidocaine as a supplement to topical anesthesia was shown not to have a clinically useful role.

28 keywords...

hide…