• J R Fioretto, R C Bonatto, S M Ricchetti, M F Carpi, M A de Moraes, and C R Padovani.
• Department of Pediatrics, São Paulo State University, Botucatu Medical School, Brazil. fioretto@fmb.unesp.br
• Croat. Med. J. 2001 Oct 1; 42 (5): 527-34.

AimTo establish a protocol for the early introduction of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) therapy in children with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and to assess its acute and sustained effects on oxygenation and ventilator settings.Patients And MethodsTen children with ARDS, aged 1 to 132 months (median, 11 months), with arterial saturation of oxygen <88% while receiving a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) >or=0.6 and a positive end-expiratory pressure of >or=10 cm H2O were included in the study. The acute response to iNO was assessed in a 4-hour dose-response test, and positive response was defined as an increase in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio of 10 mm Hg above baseline values. Conventional therapy was not changed during the test. In the following days, patients who had shown positive response continued to receive the lowest iNO dose. Hemodynamics, PaO2/FiO2, oxygenation index, gas exchange, and methemoglobin levels were obtained when needed. Inhaled nitric oxide withdrawal followed predetermined rules.ResultsAt the end of the 4-hour test, all the children showed significant improvement in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio (63.6%) and the oxygenation index (44.9%) compared with the baseline values. Prolonged treatment was associated with improvement in oxygenation, so that FiO2 and peak inspiratory pressure could be quickly and significantly reduced. No toxicity from methemoglobin or nitrogen dioxide was observed.ConclusionAdministration of iNO to children is safe. iNO causes rapid and sustained improvement in oxygenation without adverse effects. Ventilator settings can safely be reduced during iNO treatment.

22 keywords...

hide…