-
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg · Jul 2011
Is off-pump superior to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients with multivessel disease?
- Maximilian Y Emmert, Sacha P Salzberg, Burkhardt Seifert, Hector Rodriguez, Andre Plass, Simon P Hoerstrup, Jürg Grünenfelder, and Volkmar Falk.
- Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. maximilian.emmert@usz.ch
- Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Jul 1;40(1):233-9.
ObjectiveDiabetic patients often present with diffuse coronary disease than nondiabetic patients posing a greater surgical challenge during off-pump revascularization. In this study, the safety, feasibility, and completeness of revascularization for this subset of patients was assessed.MethodsFrom 2002 to 2008, 1015 diabetic patients underwent myocardial revascularization. Patients received either off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB; n = 540; 53%) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG; n = 475; 47%). Data collection was performed prospectively and data analysis was done by propensity-score (PS)-adjusted regression analysis. Primary endpoints were mortality, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), and a composite endpoint including major noncardiac adverse events (MNCAEs) such as respiratory failure, renal failure, and rethoracotomy for bleeding was applied. An index of complete revascularization (ICOR) was defined to assess complete revascularization by dividing the total number of distal anastomoses by the number of diseased vessels. Complete revascularization was assumed when ICOR was >1.ResultsOPCAB patients had a significantly lower mortality-rate (1.1% vs 3.8%; propensity-adjusted odds ratio (PAOR) = 0.11; p = 0.018) and displayed less frequent MACCE (8.3% vs 17.9%; PAOR = 0.66; p = 0.07) including myocardial infarction (1.3% vs 3.2%; PAOR = 0.33; p = 0.06) and stroke (0.7% vs 2.3%; PAOR = 0.28; p = 0.13). Similarly, a significantly lower occurrence of the noncardiac composite endpoint (MNCAE) (PAOR = 0.46; confidence interval (CI) 95% 0.35-0.91; p < 0.001) was detected. In particular, lesser respiratory failure (0.9% vs 4.3%; PAOR = 0.24; p = 0.63) and pleural effusions (3.3% vs 7.5%; PAOR = 0.45; p = 0.04) occurred, so that fast extubation (≤ 12 h postoperative) was more frequently possible (58.3% vs 34.2%; PAOR = 1.64; p = 0.007). The number of arterial grafts was significantly higher among OPCAB patients (1.54 ± 0.89 vs 1.33 ± 0.81; p = 0.006) due to a more frequent use of the right-internal mammary artery (35.6% vs 22.9%; p < 0.001). ICOR was significantly higher among CABG patients (1.24 ± 0.34 vs 1.30 ± 0.28; p = 0.001). However, for similar proportions in both groups, an ICOR > 1 was achieved clearly indicating complete revascularization (94.3% vs 93.7%; p = 0.24).ConclusionsOPCAB offers a lower mortality and superior postoperative outcomes in diabetic patients with multivessel disease. Arterial grafts are used more frequently that may contribute to better long-term outcomes and the OPCAB approach does not come at the cost of less complete revascularization.Copyright © 2010 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.