• J Toivonen, J Permi, and P H Rosenberg.
• Department of Anaesthesia, South Carelian Central Hospital, Valto Käkelänkatu 1, FIN-53130 Lappeenranta, Finland. juhani.toivonen@ekshp.fi
• Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001 May 1;45(5):603-7.

BackgroundBy choosing spinal anaesthesia instead of general anaesthesia, and by infiltrating the wound area with local anaesthetic the need for postoperative analgesics may be reduced. An ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block (IINB) in inguinal herniorrhaphy was, therefore, studied in a day surgery setting in combination with a spinal block.MethodsOne hundred ASA I-II adult patients scheduled for inguinal herniorrhaphy were given spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine. In a randomized and blinded fashion half of them received an IINB 5 min before the surgical incision with 10 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine (B-IINB) and the other half with saline (S-IINB). All patients received ketoprofen 100 mg i.v. during surgery and another 100 mg 2-3 h postoperatively. The patients were observed for about 6 h in the day surgery unit before discharge.ResultsThe results showed that in comparison with the S-IINB group, significantly fewer patients in the B-IINB group needed analgesics (P<0.01) and the amount required was also significantly less postoperatively, before discharge (about 6 h postoperatively) (P<0.05). The latency to the need for the first postoperative analgesic was shorter in the S-IINB patients (P<0.01). At home the VAS scores and the need for analgesics (oral ketoprofen 100 mg) were low with no differences between the groups. No complications occurred.ConclusionIt is concluded that no long-term analgesia could be demonstrated by a preincisional IINB performed during spinal anaesthesia in day-surgery inguinal herniorrhaphy patients. Thus, reduced analgesic requirement was seen only for about 6 h postoperatively.

25 keywords...

hide…