• H J Steiger, D Hänggi, and R Schmid-Elsaesser.
• Department of Neurosurgery, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany. steiger@uni-duesseldorf.de
• Acta Neurochir. Suppl. 2005 Jan 1;94:115-22.

AbstractAwareness of a potential arteriovenous fistula is critical for diagnosis of cranial as well as spinal fistulas. The natural history of cranial and spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas has been clarified during the last decade and interdisciplinary therapies have experienced a substantial development recently. The classification of Cognard & Merland is now the most widely accepted one for cranial dural AVF. It is based on the degree of flow reversal in the sinuses and cortical veins and reflects well the natural history of the different lesions and serves as basis for therapeutic indications. Several studies have defined the annual bleeding risk of cranial dural fistulas between 1.8 and 15%, depending on the pattern of venous drainage and initial symptomatology. Surgical, endovascular and radiosurgical methods must be selectively chosen for the treatment. The risk associated with surgical or endovascular treatment of benign fistulas is higher than the risk of eliminating fistulas that have already led to cortical venous reflux. Transvenous endovascular occlusion or surgical disconnection of draining veins is the treatment of first choice for cranial and spinal dAVF with venous flow reversal. Benign cranial dural arteriovenous fistulas are a developing indication for radiosurgery.

21 keywords...

hide…