• Am J Otolaryngol · Jul 2010

    Comparative Study

    Influence of audit on clinical practice: multidisciplinary team data documentation for cutaneous head and neck malignancy.

    • Ravinder Natt, Peter D Karkos, and Apostolos Karkanevatos.
    • Department of Otolaryngology, Leighton Hospital, Crewe, UK.
    • Am J Otolaryngol. 2010 Jul 1;31(4):261-5.

    BackgroundPrognosis of cutaneous head and neck malignant neoplasms is related to type, site, and histologic feature but may also be influenced by delays in the referral process. Treatment aims to address the primary lesion and when necessary the secondary disease but at the same time maintaining quality of life and minimizing cosmetic deformity. The management plan should ideally be the "product" of a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach of dermatologists, surgeons, oncologists, pathologists, and radiologists.AimsThe purposes of the study were as follows: (i) to review current documentation practice of cutaneous head and neck malignancies in a district hospital, (ii) to generate an MDT-approved data collection proforma, and finally (iii) to reaudit documentation of head and neck skin lesions based on the "new" standardized proforma. The MDT-approved proforma was instituted in an effort not only to collect data in a coherent and structured way but also to achieve early diagnosis and avoid delays from urgent referral to treatment with the aim of curing disease and restoring patients to as near-normal appearance and quality of life as possible.MethodsThe notes of patients with head and neck cutaneous lesions were prospectively audited for a 6-month period (August 2006-January 2007). The presence and absence of a minimal standardized data set required for MDT discussion and review were recorded.ResultsDocumentation was deficient and a need for change in practice emerged. An MDT-approved data collection standardized proforma was designed and distributed throughout the hospital departments involved in management of patients with head and neck cutaneous lesions. The notes of these patients were prospectively reaudited through a second cycle for a 6-month period (February 2007-August 2007). The completion and deficiency of sections of the MDT-approved data collection standardized proforma were recorded, resulting in closure of the audit loop.ConclusionsThe data documentation for head and neck cutaneous lesions has significantly improved after the implementation of an MDT-approved data collection standardized proforma. This has resulted in improved patient quality of care and progression on appropriate management plans.Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.