• The Journal of infection · Jan 2000

    Clinical features, laboratory findings and management of meningococcal meningitis in England and Wales: report of a 1997 survey. Meningococcal meningitis: 1997 survey report.

    • L Ragunathan, M Ramsay, R Borrow, M Guiver, S Gray, and E B Kaczmarski.
    • Meningococcal Reference Unit, Withington Hospital, Manchester, UK.
    • J. Infect. 2000 Jan 1;40(1):74-9.

    ObjectivesTo describe the epidemiological, clinical and laboratory features of meningococcal meningitis and the effects of antibiotics on laboratory investigations under current clinical practices in England and Wales.MethodsUsing a telephone questionnaire, information was gathered on 103 cases with a clinical diagnosis of meningococcal meningitis. Included were cases with samples submitted to the Public Health Laboratory Service (PHLS), Meningococcal Reference Unit (MRU) over a 5-month period in 1997. Tests included microscopic examination, latex agglutination and culture for Neisseria meningitidis, and at MRU confirmation of identification and characterization of isolates and meningococcal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis on blood and cerebrospinal fluids (CSF).ResultsClinically 45% of the cases had predominantly meningitis and 55% had septicaemia and meningitis. Only 29% of the cases received pre-admission benzylpenicillin, and 66% were given antibiotics within an hour of hospital attendance. Microbiological confirmation was achieved in 97 cases, 46 (44%) by traditional tests and 92 (89%) by PCR assay, including some with both. The blood culture positive rate was 23 (22%), but in predominant meningitis the rate was only 10% (5/46). PCR was the sole method of confirmation in 48 cases. Seventy percent of the plasma samples referred were reactive by PCR assay, but all samples taken more than 24 h after hospital antibiotics were non-reactive. PCR-based techniques increased the overall number of cases with a serogroup identified by 44%. Lumbar punctures were performed in 73 of the cases and microbiological confirmation was achieved in 67 (92%) of these cases, compared to 26/30 without lumbar puncture (LP). Eighty-nine percent of the CSF samples referred were reactive by PCR; 50% of the CSF samples taken more than 24 h after hospital antibiotics were reactive, whilst none were positive by culture or microscopy.ConclusionDue to variable clinical manifestations, early diagnosis and treatment was difficult. Laboratory confirmation has been improved by the introduction of PCR-based techniques. Meningococcal DNA was detected by molecular methods in CSF samples taken up to 72 h after commencement of antibiotics. During this period patients could be stabilized and the chances of complications attendant upon early LP reduced. In addition to providing accurate epidemiological information, confirming the diagnosis may alter the extent and length of follow-up.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.