• Vanessa Stadlbauer and Simon Wallner.
• Department of Internal Medicine, Intensive Care Unit, Medical University of Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria. vanessa.stadlbauer@meduni-graz.at
• J Crit Care. 2011 Aug 1;26(4):433.e1-11.

PurposeMultianalyte point-of-care (POC) devices are important to guide clinical decisions in critical care. However, the use of different devices in one hospital might cause problems. Therefore, we evaluated 3 commonly used POC devices and analyzed accuracy, reliability, and bias.MethodsSeventy-four arterial blood samples were analyzed by 3 POC devices (Cobas, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany; ABL800 Flex, Radiometer GmbH, Germany; Gem Premiere, Instrumentation Laboratory, Germany). For selected parameters, samples were also analyzed in the central laboratory. pCO2, pO2, SO2, bicarbonate and standard bicarbonate, sodium, potassium, calcium, pH, lactate, base excess (BE[B] and BEecf), glucose, hemoglobin, and hematocrit were compared.ResultsFor most parameters, only minor, although statistically significant, changes were observed between the POC devices. For pO2, BE(B), hemoglobin, and hematocrit, clinically significant differences were found.ConclusionAlthough POC devices are of high standard and overall comparability between devices is high, there might be a clinically relevant bias between devices, as found in our study for pO2, BE(B), hemoglobin, and hematocrit. This can be of importance when interpreting results of the same patient obtained from different POC devices, as it could happen when a patient is transferred within a hospital where different devices are used.Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

11 keywords...

hide…