• BMJ · Jan 2012

    Relation between volume and outcome for patients with severe sepsis in United Kingdom: retrospective cohort study.

    • Jason Shahin, David A Harrison, and Kathryn M Rowan.
    • Department of Critical Care, Respiratory Division, McGill University, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3G 1A4. Jason.shahin@mcgill.ca
    • BMJ. 2012 Jan 1;344:e3394.

    ObjectiveTo evaluate whether a relation exists between volume and outcome for admissions with severe sepsis to adult general critical care units in the United Kingdom.DesignRetrospective cohort study using data from a pooled case mix and outcome database.SettingAdult general critical care units participating in the case mix programme.ParticipantsConsecutive admissions to participating units for the years 2008-09 meeting objective, standardised criteria for severe sepsis.Main Outcome MeasuresMortality at ultimate discharge from acute hospital.ResultsThe primary exposure was volume of admissions with severe sepsis per unit per year. A multivariable logistic regression analysis, using generalised estimating equations, was used to assess the association between volume, modelled using fractional polynomials, and ultimate acute hospital mortality while adjusting for potential confounders. No relation was seen between volume and outcome for admissions with severe sepsis to adult, general critical care units in the UK. Subgroup analyses tested for interactions between the effect of volume and acute severity of illness or receipt of mechanical ventilation. No significant interactions were found.ConclusionsThis study showed no relation between volume and outcome in admissions with severe sepsis treated in adult general critical care units in the UK.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…