• J Kekoni, I Tikkala, A Pertovaara, and H Hämäläinen.
• Department of Psychology, University of Helsinki, Finland.
• Somatosens Mot Res. 1990 Jan 1;7(4):353-63.

AbstractIt was recently shown that the cutaneous sensitivity to airpuffs is decreased by a low-frequency vibrotactile masker in the hairy skin, and by a low-frequency but especially by a high-frequency masker in the glabrous skin. In the current study, the spatial features of this masking effect were determined in four healthy human subjects, using a reaction time paradigm. The masking effect decreased monotonically with increasing interstimulus distance, and identically in longitudinal and transverse (i.e., lateral) directions in the palm or dorsal surface of the hand. The masking effect was stronger in the glabrous than in the hairy skin, especially in the fingers. In the glabrous skin, the spread of masking effect produced by a high-frequency masker was more extensive than that produced by a low-frequency masker. The mechanical spread of high-frequency vibration was less extensive than that of low-frequency vibration in the skin. In the glabrous skin, a masker applied to the tip of the finger produced a stronger masking effect on sensations in the base of the finger than when the masker was located at the base and the test stimulus was located at the tip. It is concluded that mechanical spread of vibration in the skin is of minor importance in explaining the masking effects. Different peripheral neural mechanisms underlie the airpuff-elicited sensations in the hairy and glabrous skin. The afferent inhibitory mechanisms are stronger for signals coming from the glabrous skin of the fingers than for signals coming from the hairy skin. Furthermore, the peripheral innervation density and size of the cortical representational areas may be of importance in determining the magnitude of the masking effect.

32 keywords...

hide…