• J Clin Nurs · Mar 2008

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    Comparison of homecare costs of local wound care in surgical patients randomized between occlusive and gauze dressings.

    • Dirk Th Ubbink, Hester Vermeulen, and Jarne van Hattem.
    • Academic Medical Center at the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. d.ubbink@amc.nl
    • J Clin Nurs. 2008 Mar 1;17(5):593-601.

    Aims And ObjectivesTo study the material and nursing costs and outcome of wound care at home comparing two dressing groups (occlusive vs. gauze-based) in surgical patients after hospital dismissal.BackgroundThe large variety in dressing materials and lack of convincing evidence make the choice for optimum local wound care at home cumbersome. Occlusive wound dressings require a lower change frequency than gauze-based dressings, which appears especially useful for homecare patients and could save costs.MethodsWe investigated a consecutive series of 76 patients with wounds, included in a randomized trial comparing occlusive vs. gauze dressings. Daily dressing change frequency, consumption of dressing materials and need for district nursing visits were recorded until wound closure by means of diaries and at outpatient visits. Costs were expressed as means and 95% confidence intervals (CI) after calculation using non-parametric bootstrapping.ResultsPatient groups were similar regarding age, wound size and aetiology. Dressing change frequency in the occlusive group (median: 0.6/day) was significantly (p = 0.008) lower than in the gauze group (1.1/day). Mean daily material costs of modern dressings were euro5.31 vs. euro0.71 in the gauze group. Mean difference; euro4.60 (95% CI, euro2.68-euro6.83) while daily total (material plus nursing) costs showed no difference between the groups; mean euro2.86 (95% CI, euro-6.50-euro10.25). Wound healing in the gauze-treated group tended to be quicker than in the occlusive dressing group (medians: 30 vs. 48 days, respectively; log-rank p = 0.060).ConclusionsThe use of occlusive dressings does not lead to a reduction in costs and wound healing time as compared with gauze dressings for surgical patients receiving wound care at home.Relevance To Clinical PracticeDistrict nurses should reconsider using gauze-based dressings, particularly in surgical patients with exudating wounds.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.