• Intensive care medicine · Mar 1997

    How reliable is the predictive value of SEP (somatosensory evoked potentials) patterns in severe brain damage with special regard to the bilateral loss of cortical responses?

    • B Pohlmann-Eden, K Dingethal, H J Bender, and W Koelfen.
    • Department of Neurology, Mannheim Hospital of the University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer, Germany.
    • Intensive Care Med. 1997 Mar 1;23(3):301-8.

    ObjectiveIn patients sustaining severe brain damage (SBD), prediction of later outcome is often very difficult, in particular under conditions of therapeutic management like relaxation and intravenous phenobarbital. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) correlated best with later prognosis and expected neurological deficit. In detail, the primary bilateral loss of cortical responses (BLCR) is regarded to be a reliable marker for poor prognosis. The goal of the following prospective study was to reassess the prognostic value of early serial median nerve SEP recording in severe brain damage in comparison to other neurophysiological, clinical, and neuroradiological parameters and, additionally, to test the hypothesis, that the BLCR-pattern is always associated with a poor prognosis and is never reversible.DesignProspective study.SettingAnaesthesiological hospital intensive care unit.Patients And Participants42 comatose patients with severe brain damage (29 males/13 females), mean age 39.6 +/- 19.3 years, mean initial Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) 6.6 +/- 3.1, investigated by means of median somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) and brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP) with serial recordings on day 1, 3 to 4, and 8 to 1, and repeated cranial computerized tomography.Measurements And ResultsWe classified the outcome according to the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). Our data showed a high correlation of initial SEP scores (Spearman correlation coefficient = -0.70) with outcome for both a favorable and an unfavorable prognosis (p = 0.0001). The reliability increased with serial recordings. The SEPs showed superiority to parallel brainstem auditory evoked potentials (Spearman correlation coefficient = -0.50, p = 0.0007), GCS, and standardized neuroradiological criteria. Primary (BLCR) occurred in 16 patients (38%) and implied a fatal prognosis in all adult patients (n = 15, specificity = 93.3%, sensitivity = 59.3%). In contrast, a young child with predominant brainstem hemorrhagic contusions regained consciousness and developed mild to moderate neurological deficit (GOS 3-4) during long-term follow-up of 4 years. This clinical improvement paralleled bilateral asymmetric recovery of cortical SEP responses.ConclusionsSEP allow an early reliable assessment of both poor and good prognosis in SBD, in particular when applied serially. BLCR does not always imply a fatal diagnosis, as a circumscribed contusional lesion rarely may lead to selective reversible blockage of ascending somatosensory pathways in the brainstem. In contradiction to this lesional etiology, a hypoxia-induced BLCR pattern seems to correlate strictly with a poor prognosis, reflecting a different pathogenesis with diffuse destruction of cortex and thalamocortical pathways.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.