• A Pesonen, R Suojaranta-Ylinen, P Tarkkila, and P H Rosenberg.
• Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. Anne.Pesonen@hus.fi
• Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008 Feb 1;52(2):267-73.

BackgroundPost-operatively, elderly patients with impaired vision and cognitive dysfunction may experience difficulties understanding standard pain assessment tools such as the 10-cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Verbal Rating Scale (VRS). Thus, there is a need to identify more feasible post-operative pain assessments for elderly patients. With this goal in mind, we compared the VAS and VRS with two more expressive tools: the 50-cm Red Wedge Scale (RWS) and the Facial Pain Scale (FPS).MethodsCardiac surgery patients (73 +/- 5 years, mean +/- SD) were allocated to an RWS (n=80) or an FPS (n=80) group. Pain was assessed at rest and after movement during the first 4 days after tracheal extubation. The RWS or FPS assessments were repeated after 10 min. All patients completed the VRS and VAS.ResultsThe rates of successful pain measurement on study day 1 were: VRS 86%, VAS 62%, RWS 78%, and FPS 60%. Pain measurements with the RWS correlated with the VAS (r=0.758, P<0.001) and weaker with the VRS (r=0.666, P<0.001) measurements. Pain measurements with the FPS correlated well with the VAS (r=0.873, P<0.001) and weaker with the VRS (r=0.583, P<0.001) measurements. With all scales, success rates improved during the study period.ConclusionIn elderly patients, immediately after cardiac surgery, the VRS is the most feasible pain scale, followed by the RWS. The traditional 10-cm VAS is unsuitable for pain measurement in this population.

21 keywords...

hide…